Chinese Court Treats Bitcoin as Property in 107 BTC Memory Theft Case

A man in eastern China was sentenced to 10 years and nine months in prison after stealing 107 Bitcoin using a memorized wallet seed phrase. The case highlights how Chinese courts can treat Bitcoin as property in criminal proceedings.

Chinese Court Treats Bitcoin as Property in 107 BTC Memory Theft Case

What happened?

A man in eastern China was sentenced to 10 years and nine months in prison after stealing 107 Bitcoin using a memorized wallet seed phrase. The case highlights how Chinese courts can treat Bitcoin as property in criminal proceedings.

Why it matters

For crypto holders, the case is a reminder that wallet security depends heavily on controlling access to recovery phrases. For the broader ecosystem, it adds another example of courts applying property concepts to Bitcoin when resolving criminal conduct involving digital assets.

A court in eastern China sentenced a man to 10 years and nine months in prison after he stole 107 Bitcoin using a wallet mnemonic he had memorized, according to Cointelegraph. The case centered on access to a crypto wallet through its seed phrase, rather than a conventional account breach.

The ruling matters because the court treated Bitcoin as property in the theft case, a point closely watched by crypto users and companies operating around custody, wallet security and digital asset disputes. While China maintains strict limits on crypto trading activity, the case shows that courts can still address Bitcoin ownership in a criminal context.

Mnemonic phrases, often called seed phrases, are the human-readable backups that can restore access to a crypto wallet. Anyone who knows the phrase can potentially control the wallet’s assets, making it one of the most sensitive pieces of information in self-custody.

The sentence also underscores the legal exposure tied to stealing digital assets, even when the method does not involve hacking software or breaking into an exchange. In this case, the reported theft depended on remembered access credentials and resulted in a prison term of nearly 11 years.

For crypto holders, the case is a reminder that wallet security depends heavily on controlling access to recovery phrases. For the broader ecosystem, it adds another example of courts applying property concepts to Bitcoin when resolving criminal conduct involving digital assets.

Source: Cointelegraph

Keep exploring

Related stories

Stocks Overtake Crypto on Hyperliquid as Real-World Assets Gain Ground

Stocks Overtake Crypto on Hyperliquid as Real-World Assets Gain Ground

For the first time, real-world assets such as stocks, commodities, and market indices surpassed crypto on Hyperliquid, the largest decentralized derivatives exchange. The shift highlights growing activity in tokenized and tradable exposure to traditional markets on-chain.

Read
Anthropic Says Claude Opus 5 Outperforms Fable 5 on Most Benchmarks at Lower Cost

Anthropic Says Claude Opus 5 Outperforms Fable 5 on Most Benchmarks at Lower Cost

Anthropic has introduced Claude Opus 5, its new everyday model, which it says beats its frontier product on most benchmarks while costing less to use. The release highlights continued competition around model performance and pricing in the AI market.

Read
Crypto Advocacy Groups Back CLARITY Act as US Market Structure Debate Tightens

Crypto Advocacy Groups Back CLARITY Act as US Market Structure Debate Tightens

Industry groups are urging US lawmakers to advance the CLARITY Act as the deadline for passing a comprehensive crypto market structure bill narrows ahead of the 2026 elections. The push comes as ethics-related rules continue to draw resistance.

Read